8.31.2010

155:365 Before & After 8.25.10

pennies-before
Before.

pennies-after-close-up.jpg
After.

My two cents: Same lens (Canon 70-200 2.8) on both. The "before" is the minimum focusing distance (about 4 feet). The "after" is the minimum focusing distance once I put on my new close-up adapter (about 4 inches). Quite a difference. I'm happy with my purchase.

154:365 Before & After 8.24.10

baseball-before.jpg
Before.

baseball-after-miniature.jpg
After.

Miniature baseball game. The Tigers won.

8.25.2010

153:365 Letters 8.23.10

s-fireworks.jpg
The SS is not all bad.

This was actually at Shir Shalom so the SS was quite serendipitous...Matilda enjoyed the fireworks thoroughly, and then passed out in the car on the way home.

152:365 Letters 8.22.10

a-street-light.jpg
Ay?

8.24.2010

151:365 Letters 8.21.10

v-tongs-hotdog-buns.jpg
Nice buns.

150:365 Letters 8.20.10

o-brick-wall.jpg
Oh.

Not at this one, but at similar structure at the corner of 13 mile and Southfield, not far from where I grew up, my friend Paul lied to me. He said that he had skateboarded all the way around the circle. The circle I'm speaking of is about 3 times the size of this one and about 5 feet higher off the ground. I believed him. I mean, what 7 year old wouldn't believe their best friend who had a rat-tail and a cross earring (his mom was a minister). I may have been a little gullible.

149:365 Letters 8.19.10

p-bedpost.jpg
Master P.

148:365 Letters 8.18.10

w-building.jpg
W, M, or N... you pick.

147:365 Letters 8.17.10

g-wires.jpg
What up?

8.18.2010

146:365 Negative Space 8.16.10

three-guys-at-quicken.jpg
more bars in more places.

No, it's not AT&T, it's the new Quicken offices in Detroit. I was on an assignment there for the Jewish News and I liked all the design elements they have going on. If I wanted an office job, I would think that would be a cool office to work at.

145:365 Negative Space 8.15.10

double-rainbow.jpg
What does it mean??

I couldn't resist. It may not be the best example of "negative space" but in honor of the recent youtube phenomenon and Ellen and Phil's wedding (where this was taken) I chose the double rainbow. All the way across the sky.

144:365 Negative Space 8.14.10

slide.jpg
ready. set. go!

wooden-play-structure.jpg
exploring.

We played at the park for a little while this morning. Matilda hasn't been on the blog in a little while, so I decided to share two today.

143:365 Negative Space 8.13.10

symmetry.jpg
Symmetry.

8.17.2010

143:365 Negative Space 8.12.10

light-trail.jpg
gesture.

I'm pretty sure this wasn't an intentional photo. Sometimes you just get lucky. I had some cute shots of my dogs sitting at a street corner and some esoteric ones of some street lamps, but I kept coming back to this one. Maybe it's the simplicity or the abstractness of it that I struggled to capture 2 weeks ago... whatever it is, here it is.

142:365 Negative Space 8.11.10

no-tree.jpg
stumped.

The tree in front of my in-laws house was removed the other day. It just feels empty now. It was a huge tree that lost a significant limb during a big storm a few weeks back. Now it's a stump.

8.11.2010

141:365 Negative Space 8.10.10

the-climb.jpg
Positive space.

I spent part of the day photographing for Summer in the City. They are truly a creator of positive space in a place that has gotten such negative press - Detroit. Their volunteer projects range from muraling and community gardening to running free summer camps for children in underprivileged areas. Today I was photographing at the Latino Mission Society in southwest Detroit. SITC runs a camp there where they have an average of 80 kids show up every Tuesday through Friday. The kids are paired with a "buddy" and they play games and organized activities and just have an all around good time.

I took lots of photos of the kids and their volunteer buddies. I haven't had time to go through all of them, but here are a few more that fit with the "Negative Space" theme I'm going with this week. I hate to say anything is "negative" about SITC or these kids, so I'll call these "positive space."

under-the-slide.jpg

two-girls-on-bench.jpg
Life is like a box of chocolates...

girl-painting.jpg

IMG_2290.jpg

hallway.jpg

boy-at-the-fence.jpg

If you have some free time on Friday, you should stop by for the last day of SITC this summer. It's going to be a blast - I'll be there. Check out their website for more info.

140:365 Shadows 8.9.10

IMG_1379.jpg
barcode.

Happy 8.9.10!

139:365 Shadows 8.8.10

IMG_1357.jpg
upstairs...

What is up there? a haunting ghost? a bunch of cobwebs inhabited by a basketball sized spider? A portrait of Dorian Gray? No, it's even scarier - an almost 2 year old!!! Don't worry, she's sleeping. For now...

8.09.2010

138:365 Shadows 8.7.10

alpacca-in-the-shade.jpg
an alpaca in the shade and some detail in the sky.

Here's the thing about digital cameras, they can't really capture everything we see. Even the best ones pale in comparison to the human eye. Digital cameras have a notoriously narrow range of exposure (or "dynamic range" for those who speak tech talk). Basically, this means that if you are looking at a scene with a large contrast between the bright areas (highlights) and the dark areas (shadows), you can't properly expose (see) both at the same time.

This is the problem that arises when you are trying to shoot outside on a sunny day. There are bright areas in the photo, usually the sky, and then there are dark areas, or the harsh shadows cast in bright sun. Your eyes can see both at the same time, but the camera can't. You have to make a choice. Do I expose the photo for the highlights or for the shadows? If you choose one, you usually lose detail in the other. This photo is a great example of that bright sunny day... but wait, what's that you say? You see details in the shadows and the highlights? Well, that's the magic of post-processing. What comes out of the camera looks like blah, the sky is all white and the shade is too dark, but what you can do with the information hidden in the zeros and ones is quite remarkable. When you play around with the little sliders in Adobe Lightroom and find those details in the highlights and shadows that you thought had disappeared, you can massage the pixels into showing us something close to what our eyes can see. Unfortunately it takes a good amount of time on the computer to coax out these details, whereas our eyes do it instantaneously.

The funny thing is that most people will look at a photo like this and say "that's not real, they did something to it in photoshop." And while that is true, the intention for doing this was to be able to bring it back to reality - to show the full dynamic range of the scene, or simply, show what our eyes see. So the next time you are squinting on a sunny day, be thankful that you can see the bright blue in the sky as well as the girl under the umbrella laying on the beach. If your eyes were like a digital camera, you might have to choose which one to see (I'd go with the latter...).

137:365 Shadows 8.6.10

stress-shadows.jpg
Stress.

Don't worry, she's just acting for the sake of the photo. The dramatic shadows didn't feel like a smiley happy photo. Sorry, they can't all be smiley and happy. Maybe next week. Thanks for modeling (and putting up with me), sweetie.

136:365 Shadows 8.5.10

spork.jpg
Spork.

Yes, this is a metal spork. Albeit a little more fork than spoon, but it's the closest thing to a spork I've found of the non-desposable sort. I believe it was borrowed from a Lufthansa flight back when you didn't have to pay for crackers.

135:365 Shadows 8.4.10

lurking-in-the-shadows.jpg
Lurking in the shadows...

134:365 Shadows 8.3.10

my-shadow.jpg
i wish i was a little bit taller...

Cliche? Yes, but necessary in any good exploration of shadows. Think of it as self-realization. It's all the rage in the groundhog world.

8.05.2010

133:365 Abstract 8.2.10

purple-bokeh.jpg
purple corn.

So now that abstract is done, I have come to appreciate good abstract photos much more that I previously did. I actually thought this would be a pretty easy week, but it turned out to be much more difficult. I define abstract as something that has no easily identifiable object in the image and looks at the light, color, shape or texture more so than any specific subject. I am usually trying to get sharp, well composed images of people, places or objects, so this week forced me to check my natural instincts at the door and see deeper than the physical subject. I found myself deferring to out-of-focus photos that are essentially all bokeh, or the blurry part of a photo (days 131 & 133). Because it was a struggle, it felt a little contrived or cliche most of the time - hopefully the results didn't come across in that way. In short, it's been a humbling week, but that's not a bad thing.

132:365 Abstract 8.1.10

abstract-reflection.jpg
in the hood.

8.03.2010

131:365 Abstract 7.31.10

fire-engine-bokeh.jpg
Not an emergency.

What am I?

130:365 Abstract 7.30.10

s-curve.jpg
S-curve.

Lit with my iphone.

129:365 Abstract 7.29.10

wood-glass-steel.jpg
glass, wood & steel.

Shot at the Forest Grill in Birmingham while on assignment for StyleLine. Look for the drink photo in the October issue.

128:365 Abstract 7.28.10

pinot.jpg
bouquet bokeh.